From earlier Count wrote: Posted: Jun 28, 2005 12:35 AM
Ahh but not all come with their parents, see this is the key, You have the place, you have the 33 page application form, then add in the rules and regulations.
You can bet that none of the kids were talked to with in the place today, and what was seen was drones sitting watching and listening to the un lisenced freaks in control. All equipment that would cause problems was removed and you can bet they found "NO Zach" as he was taken and placed out of the way, and the only people present were " the chosen few".
Bottom line it's not about child abuse, it was supposed to be an investagation into the entire place. Once again it has been shown that what Smid says the world of Christians living in JesusLand will embrace his words.
the comments " Edwards said DCS can't say if its investigation is related to that boy's situation or even specify when the complaint was filed. But Smid says it is connected. He said the accusation was likely filed by someone who just read the blog and used it "as a foundation to stir up a bunch of stuff." Added Smid: "The doors are not locked down, and the kids are not required to be here, and they come here with their parents." "
Yet in all of this what an investagation requires has not been done?? Besides this now means Smid has no choice but to double , triple , Quad the efforts to prove his case.
Oh and for the record: The doors are "LOCKED DOWN" and he refuses to allow kids to be met on the clause of "confidentiality"
You know- it's funny... Before the investigation was dropped, no one could get a word out of Smid. However, after the investigation ends, he's talking to reporters about it. That's somewhat suspicious in my book.
well, yeah. he's not going to have anyone thinking badly of his program, now. so of course he wants to be heard. i have to admit i am a little disappointed by the outcome of the investigation. Just remember, that every time one door closes, more will open.